ultranomics

an interesting comment we received this week from a reader referring to our views as leftist! So I looked up a concise definition and came up with:
“One who holds a left-wing viewpoint; someone who seeks radical social and economic change in the direction of greater equality. ”

I can see how the valued reader may have come to this conclusion, after all we are all too often having digs at ‘the establishment’. But, just to clarify for the benefit of all, we are not at all anti-establishment. Neither are we particularly socialist.

Au contraire mes amis we believe that ‘free market’ capitalism, though not perfect, is the best system we currently have. We believe that human enterprise should be rewarded in direct proportion to the inspiration and perspiration applied. Most of the time it works pretty well, sometimes perhaps too well (ask the Chinese!) Hence on occasion some powers feel compelled to manipulate it (ask the Americans), for example with trade barriers, subsidies, bailouts, credit pumping and so on. Fortunately though, in its truest form, the free market is a force of nature. It is the combined sum of all human economic endeavour.

In the short term markets can be somewhat manipulated by those with vested interests, be it market makers including the banks, cartels such as OPEC, government policy makers or hedge funds. Their activities influence the herd-mentality bubble-brigade (that includes many of us) who as a group are the end ‘voters’ who bid up assets such as stocks and houses.

As they say in stock market parlance, “In the short term the market is a voting machine, but in the long term it is a weighing machine“. Speculation might work short term, but only sustained hard work or skill pays off long term. In the end the market is far too complex to remain under any one group or nation’s control. It always reverts to its optimum state, and the force of the snap-back tends to be directly proportional to the degree of manipulation (or dumbness) which preceded it.

So, fellow comrades…err….citizens….we are not fuzzy thinking leftists after all. We don’t want to change the world – heck we wouldn’t even know what to change it to. We just want to see through the haze and perhaps get a few faint glimpses of the reality that is so often hidden from us. We want to expose the world of economics ‘as it is’ with a view to steering a course through the murkiness without getting our fingers burned; without ending up penniless towards the end of our miserable existences. Furthermore, being the nice people that we are, we want to share it all with you, our readers. Ultranomics commentary is meant to inform and entertain and to make you think. There are no political agendas or aims to be found on these pages. Honest, guv……

The award for the most depressing story of the week goes to……..

First the Somali pirates, now the Mumbai terrorists. At least the former were in it just for the money. The latter have proven more blood-thirsty. In the last Ultraletter we spoke about the 23rd century utopia of Star Trek. How far we truly are from that ideal.

With just under 200 dead we have no clear idea who they are and why they’ve done it. One thing we do know, they were highly organised and well equipped. They had insiders at the hotels who smuggled in the explosives. They had boats to drop them off, off the coast of Mumbai. They specifically targeted India’s financial hub and went after Westerners in particular. They planned it so well yet left an easy peasy trail of breadcrumbs back to…..you’ve guessed it…Pakistan. Doh!

I am no conspiracy theorist by nature – I even believe that the Americans really did go to the moon, much to the disdain of JQ ! – but you have to ask yourself who would have most to gain from this crime at a time when India and Pakistan are building bridges and getting pally once more? What’s worse is that the average man in the rickshaw falls for it. As surely as A is followed by B the terrorists cause some carnage and hey presto, the steadying relations of the two neighbours are blown to smithereens together with the perpetrators themselves. At who’s behest though, that is the question.

Perhaps Kashmiri activists making a point over territory? Perhaps Pakistan-based Islamic militants making trouble for the Pak govt over their support for America? Perhaps insiders who can’t abide any Friendship with the old enemy? Perhaps it could even be some other nation (or nations) that fear the possibility of an IndoPakChinese Superpower in the sense of military (nuclear) capability or economic strength? Who’s playing the long game here…..?